<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Not To Be Trusted With Knives - Latest Comments in Socratic Irony</title><link>http://drbethsnow.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://drbethsnow.disqus.com/socratic_irony/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:17:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Socratic Irony</title><link>http://www.drbethsnow.com/2008/07/09/socratic-irony/#comment-12018722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Demonweed - The dictionary I was look at clearly needs a better definition.  I can see how Socratic irony would relate, as you say, to the Socratic method and that the questions by the instructor using the Socratic method would be Socratically ironic (because, of course, they know the answer to the question when they ask it)... but stupid &lt;a href="http://dictionary.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="dictionary.com"&gt;dictionary.com&lt;/a&gt; has only that vague four word definition. My kingdom for an Oxford English dictionary!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:17:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Socratic Irony</title><link>http://www.drbethsnow.com/2008/07/09/socratic-irony/#comment-12018723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, &lt;em&gt;thanks&lt;/em&gt; Demonweed for making me look up another word in the dictionary. Jeez.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan Karlsbjerg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Socratic Irony</title><link>http://www.drbethsnow.com/2008/07/09/socratic-irony/#comment-12018725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that Socratic irony refers to a specific subset of feigned ignorance where the affectation takes the form of questioning that leads others toward learning.  Typically, the Socratic method comes with a sagacious tone.  When instead it takes the form of humble curiosity, it is innately ironic since it is not possible to embark on a course of deliberately leading questions without already having some sense of the destination.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Demonweed</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Socratic Irony</title><link>http://www.drbethsnow.com/2008/07/09/socratic-irony/#comment-12018724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You read the dictionary. For fun. Weird ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:54:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>